Vaginal Rejuvination?

Ridiculous, as Heather Havrilesky from Salon so eloquently explains here, towards the bottom. I'll copy and past it below.


More alarming still, though, was the recent New York Times article on vaginal rejuvenation. Apparently, a handful of women out there are convinced that they're downright disgusting because they don't look exactly like porn stars between their legs. Naturally, they require expensive surgery to fix this "problem."
Once again, it's not the questions that get us in trouble ("Do I look weird to you, and might expensive surgery help?"), but the answers ("Yes, and yes"). Casting aside the fact that many of us blame the bottle-blond, twiggy, fake-jugged creatures who populate mainstream porn for rendering it unconvincing, unsavory and unsexy (with a close second in blame going to the big lunks with the mullets and the thighs that rub together and the frightening horse wieners and the habit of growling scintillating things like, "S-ck that c-ck, baby, yeah!"), I feel it my personal duty as a human to mention to the ladies out there that, slithering silicone mutants aside, all women look very different, and I'm betting that your stupid boyfriend or husband doesn't remotely care how things look down below, as long as he gets to survey the landscape once in a blue moon. So please, save your money for some good wine and a little French maid uniform and some bad shoes that make you fall on your face when you've had a few glasses of good wine.

How does a porn star, who uses her vagina much more than the average female, have such a non-existent entryway? O.K., that's gross talk. I'll stop.